Some Hanky Panky....

Low rise, original...where do you fit in?  We all know that the Hanky Panky thong is essential in the comfort and style department-- it simply has no rival and thus has become a cult classic.  The big question is do you go for the low rider, or the original?  We've had this debate in the store, and it is split right down the middle.  There is no age divide, or style divide, it seems to just boil down to those who like "more coverage down there" and those who are fine with more skin showing.  There are those of us who dare to go Brazilian, or close to it, and "low" doesn't scare us.  Those of us more "natural", we need more coverage on the goodies.  Either way, these are everyone's favorite thongs because they look sexy, and are actually amazingly comfortable (even my mother-in-law, a "non-throng-wearer" had to agree)!!  We've just received a shipment of a ton of delicious colors in both varieties...AND....to heighten the debate even more, we're now carrying the BOY SHORT.    The boy short is the sworn style of many-o-fashionistas, a great way to keep the backside covered and still remain the sex goddess you know you are!  Signed, ME {LV} 

Comments

[Amanda]

The hanky debate is on.....I am a orginal hanky panky wearer! I prefer the coverage on the orginal vs. the low, not because of my grooming habbits but simply due to the fact that the low rise side down really low, under my low rise jeans!!! I also dry my hanky panky's and after going thru the wash the low rise, are really really low rise, where the original after the dryer are just perfect!!! So you can have your coverage and your brazilian too!! :)

[Kirsten]

OK, I'm going to stay out of this heated debate. I love the low-rise AND the original! They are both exquisitely comfortable and sexy! ...Now I just have to try the boy shorts! :)

[Shanti Noreika]

Tried the Boy short...and I love it!! :)